Labels:bulletin board | reckoner | sky OCR: QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW (RULE 14.1a Respondents believe that the only proper question forreview Did the United IStates Court of Appeals forthe Ninth Circuitert in conciuding that "the price recei ved inoncollusive regularly conducted forec losure sale establishes irrebuttaly reasonably equivalent value under 11 U.S 548(a)2)(A)"? States concluding noncollusive reguiarly
(.png)
